About Me

Name: Darrick Johnson
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Your Guide to Forbidden Racist Terms for 2012

Apparently, the term "dark cloud of debt" is a loaded, racist term, at least when used by someone from Texas.

So Republicans can be sensitive, and avoid scandal in the 2012 presidential campaign, here is handy cheat sheet of words that will be construed as racist, and thus cannot be used:
  • "Dark Cloud of Debt"
  • Obamacare (though ObamacareS is acceptable)
  • fiscal
  • debt
  • unemployment
  • Failure (also, catastrophic failure, and miserable failure)
  • Stimulus
  • Shovel-ready
  • waiver
  • Boeing
  • NLRB
  • Libya
  • Qaddaffi (all spellings)
  • Misery Index
  • incompetent
  • Greece
  • statistics
  • trillion (to a lesser extent, billion)
  • Jimmy Carter
  • Actuary, actuarial
  • light bulb
  • 2010 budget
  • 2011 budget
  • accountability
  • Texas
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When the Tsunami is big enough...

it doesn't matter how much warning you have.  Democrats have convinced themselves that 2010 won't sweep them away like 1994, because this time they have advanced warning.  But like a tsunami, there simply isn't time to outrun the water, if the wave is big enough.  You can't treat voters with disdain for 20 months, and think some dishonest campaign ads are going to save you. 
 
Every day we get a new poll showing a previously safe Democrat in trouble.  And for those Democrats, there is no time to run...they haven't raised money, they haven't carefully voted to give themselves cover...they just thought things would blow over, and Obama's charm would sweept them to victory.  Now, they can't dare be seen with Obama, they can't change their votes, they are unpolished and rusty on the campaign trail, and the water is pulling away from the beach....hope and change can't save them now...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dino Rossi = 51?

It's looks more and more like America's slowest vote couting state will be deciding control of the Senate.   Republicans are locks in North Dakota and Arkansas as well as Indiana.   Pennsylvania and Wisconsin show nearly double digit GOP leads.   That puts the GOP halfway to the required 10 seat gain to get the majority.   Nevada, Colorado, West Virginia, and Illinois all show small Republican leads.   That leaves Washington's Dino Rossi as the key.
 
And today, we learn that Rossi banked a record 4.4 million, and has an internal poll showing a 6 point lead.  Internals usually favor the sponsoring campaign by an average of 5 points, but that still leaves the race a statistical tie.   The GOP needs the equivalant of an inside straight to get control of the Senate.  It looks like they may get it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Age Of Transparency

Barack Obama's promise to bring transparency to government has been rightly derided and  fraud.  Backroom deals and opaquely worded bills have been hallmarks of his adminstration.  But in odd way, we are living in an era of transparency.  For years conservatives have been frustrated by liberal politicians, pretending to be conservative in states that required it, pretending to be blue collar, when the situation called for it.  In the last 3 months, Democrats have torpedoed their image in all these respects.

1.  Martha Coakley and the Common Man - Coakley demonstrated with great clarity the disdain that liberal politicians have for those they govern.  Taking vacation during the campaign, deriding her opponent for campaign with the great unwashed at Fenway Park, and the list goes on.  This disdain isn't new, or unique to Coakley, but she made every American wary of politicians pretending to like sports, hunting, or NASCAR.
 
2. Ben Nelson and the Myth of the Pro-Life Democrat -With his horse trading to secure special treatment for Nebraska, in exchange for overlooking the taxpayer funding of abortion in the Senate health care bill, Nelson demonstrated what it means to be a pro-life democrat.  Its a democrat that would lose if they were pro-choice.  When he thought he could get away with siding with the Pelosi wing of the Party, he did.
 
3. Harold Ford and the Myth of "Representing [Insert Red or Purple State Here]" - In 2006, Harold Ford ran against Bob Corker for the Senate in Tenessee.  Harold Ford ran as a "pro-life, conservative Democrat".  He lost.  Now, he's running against Kristen Gillibrand in NY, as a pro-choice liberal.  As a conservative, I've long been frustrated that the Harold Ford's of the world could successfully sell themselves as post partisan "local issues" politicians, then go to Washington, and advance the most radical liberal agenda's at every turn.  Thank you Harold, for dispelling this myth!
 
4.  Barack Obama - Not much new to say here. The next time a smooth politician with no record runs on only his own charisma, we will ask better questions, and demand more substance. 
 
In a weird way, Barack Obama has done more to awaken the inner conservative in all of us than any conservative advocate could.  Obama and his Democrat cohorts have, in year, blown their cover with the American people, and it will be 30 years before these tactics of deceit can be so successfully employed agains the American voter.  Thanks Barack!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thoughts on Election Night 2009

Good to see the Democrats get a thorough butt-kicking in Virginia!  And Republicans win New Jersey by so much that late night fraud and a team of lawyers can't save it for Corzine!  Very good night!
 
It's too bad that Hoffman lost in NY-23...RNC apparatchiks are a dense lot, and they will learn the wrong lessons from this.  Their beltway minders will tell Michael Steele et. al that this proves that the party needs to move left.  It's utter nonsense, but Steele will believe it.  I'll tell you what the real lesson is.  If you spend 1 million dollars on someone who agrees with you on NOTHING, then quits and endorses the Democrat 3 days before the election, you will lose.  If Democrats want to replicate that strategy nationwide, them try. 
 
What's fascinating with NY-23 is that the "naive ideologues" like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and Sarah Palin saw through Dede Scozzafava, and the wise, grisled members of the RNC were completely fooled.  Here's hoping Hoffman is back in 2010, running a 2 person race, as a Republican...
 
In a local race in my hometown of Greeley, Colorado, we had a big time taxpayer revolt.  Our disastrous school district asked for more money for "textbooks, buses and teachers" (shouldn't that be covered with the first $170 million dollars?).  The opposition had less than $1000 dollars against $20,000 in free ads from the local paper, but got 66% of voters to say no!  It's a hard sell, going against the teachers union, the district, the local paper, and the instinctive desire to "support education", but our voters sent a clear message, demanding results first, before the school district bullies get more money in the slush fund.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Entertainer"

One outgrowth of the Steele / Limbaugh controversy is a chorus of  self - described 'serious' conservatives, like David Frum, dismissing Limbaugh as only an entertainer.   As if the two are mutually exclusive.  Do we really want, or need, a series of dry textbooks, and supporting white papers defining and defending conservatism, or do we need people who can persuade, and entertain?
 
Rush is an entertainer, but that doesn't make his positions unserious...Rush is brilliant, and a true conservative..thus far, Michael Steele has exhibited neither trait. 
 
At Intern Orientation at The Heritage Foundation, we were instructed that Heritage was different from other think tanks because they didn't just want to write papers, they wanted to influence policy...apprarently many lesser think tanks actively avoided putting position papers in the hands of policy makers until after the votes had taken place.
 
Entertainment is not an end in itself, but great ideas are often best communicated with humor...was Reagan any less a conservative hero because he could skewer liberalism with a smile? 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Looking for leaders

The first decisions we have to make as movement and party is selecting leadership.   Here are some key things we need to look for:
 
1.  Impeccable Integrity
   Few things are worse than corrupt politicians...Democrats have them in abundance.  We need to assure that they once again have a monpoly on corruption.  Corruption cannot be fought by a party that is itself compromised.   The era of Ted Stevens, Mark Foley, and Duke Cunningham cannot be allowed to repeat.  This is no time for half - measures.  Heads need to roll, and candidates and party leaders with even remotely questionable reputations need to be offer resignations, or face primary challenges.
 
2.  No Egos
   Expecting politicians to forego their ego is, well, optimistic, but it's necessary.  Too many races were lost, or made more difficult, because big egos challenged each other for safe seats, while leaving tough races uncontested.   Democrats had a free ride in far too many seats this year, while Republicans fought each other for the easy path to Congress.  No more.   No more "turn based" primaries.  It is utterly irrelevant who's turn it is.   Best Candidate, that's it.  Forget incumbency, forget years of service.  Pick the best option.  Reward those who put party and principle above personnal ambition...We'll know who they are.
 
3.  Clear Communicators
  It's no good complaining that we face a money and media disadvantage.  We need candidates and campaign managers who stop making excuses, and start articulating their message effectively.   It's not okay for our Generals to accept defeat because the battle is difficult.  They have to figure out how to win with the conditions and resources they have.  Our party leadership needs to do the same.   That means thinking creatively, being unconventional, instead of bureaucractic, careerist campaigns.  We desperately need campaign personnel that care more about their current assignment than building a resume for the next one.
 
4.  True Believers
  We now see where the so-called moderates can get us...second place.   That doesn't mean we want bomb-throwers and firebrands, but genuine conservatives are a must.  One great disadvantage we no longer face is not knowing who is really on our side.  The poor know who their real friends are.  The rich will never know.   Those who stay loyal to the Republican Party and Conservative priniciples when its not popular, will stay loyal when it is again.    Sometimes true conservatism will lose....but liberalism lite will ALWAYS lose.  
 
Tags: Rebuilding  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Rebuilding

Every Denver Bronco fan remembers their devastating defeat at the hands of Jacksonville in 1996.  Many thought it was John Elway's last chance to win a Super Bowl.   Denver was sloppy and inconsistent, and deserved their defeat.  It was, in many respects the lowest point in the history of the Franchise.    Few expected that the devastating defeat would be followed by consecutive Super Bowl wins.  And every NFL Films memoir of Denver's championships begins with that devastating loss to Jacksonville.
 
It is a low week for the Republican Party, and conservatism.  But it will also be pivotal.  If we take the right action to reform and improve our party, we can come back with a strength and passion that would be impossible absent Tuesday's defeat.   If we do the right things, future documentaries of the next great conservative leader will begin here.
 
Defeat hurts, but it is sometimes necessary.  Do we learn the right lessons from it?
 
Winston Churchill said there was nothing so exhilerating as being shot at with no effect.   The converse is true...there is a certain calm about being shot at and feeling the full effect.  For years our party has won, but barely.  And in many respects, that made us too afraid to lose...to afraid to be bold.  We were nervous, not confident.
 
One more football story:
 
Young quarterbacks are sometimes instructed to take a hit early in the game, to get over their nerves.  The fear of being hit is often worse than the hit.  Paralyzing fear is replaced by calm confidence, having taken the hit, and knowing it can be withstood.
 
We have taken the hit.  It hurts.  But now, hopefully, we can leave nervous, timid campaigns behind, and play in hope of winning, not in fear of losing.
Tags: Rebuilding  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thoughts on a lousy election night...

1.  Congratulations to Barack Obama.   
I don't agree with him on much, and none of my objections to his presidency have changed...but it is a moment worth pausing to reflect.  Think of the American founders, many of whom saw the evil of slavery, seeing a black man assume the highest office in the land...I'm disappointed tonight in the political choice my fellow Americans have made, but I'm proud that it was a political choice, not a racial one.
 
2.  To My Conservative Friends:  Be Calm.
Remember what we felt and still feel about the Democrats awful treatment of George Bush.  Don't return the favor.  Barack Obama won, he's going to be our President, and we owe him our prayers and best wishes.  His failures will be our failures, and his successes ours.   I want to beat Obama in 4 years, but not at the expense of rooting for America's failure in the meantime.   Hyperbole and name-calling are ineffective, and inappropriate, but very easy to indulge in...we have to fight the temptation.  Don't ever forget how Bush was treated.  And remember that feeling when you are angry with Obama or his supporters.
 
3.  To My Liberal Friends:  Why We Distrust You
Your party is different, more militant, and less moderate than it was in 1992.   Everyone supports the rights of minority when they are in the minority...only those with true character support the rights of the minority when they don't have to.   Barack Obama's campaign, and the Democratic Party at large have shown certain anti-democratic tendencies, kicking McCain supporting reports off the plane, Black Panthers at the polls, Acorn's voter fraud effort.  We will be watching you reaction to anti-speech measures like the Fairness Doctrine.  We will note your vigilance or lack thereof in purging voter fraud, and ensuring clean elections.  We will note Obama's tolerance of dissent and criticism.  Will critics be respected as a 'loyal opposition' or pilloried as 'opponents of change.'   Militancy is almost humerous amongst those without power...its scary when it wields real power.   We hope to see the militancy depart when your side takes over, but doubt that it will.
 
4. Going Forward:  Why did we lose? 
 
2002-2006:
The damage done to our party by the fecklessness and corruption of certain Republicans in 2002-2006 cannot be minimized.   Corrupt and incompentent Republicans have to be purged, no matter how likeable, or nice they be...Corruption kills...its not fair that Democrats get away with more, but we can't control them, we can control our own party.  They dilute our message, ruin our brand, and vaccinate Democrats against very appropriate charges of corruption.
 
Inside the box:
There has been little or no creativity in our party about how to reach voters.   We do what we always have...we run look-alike attack ads with scary grain video, and an ominous narrator...it blends in the background, wastes money at best, and is counter productive at worst.  The next years will offer unprecedented opporrunity to find new ways to reach undecided voters.  We preach about the dynamism of the market, but we run our campaigns like the post office...we do what we have always done, and if we get outspent, we lose.   We need to figure out how to win and persuade without clumsy, ill-conceived advertising.
 
Shaping the battlefield:
20 years ago, this race would have ended, in John McCain's favor, after Obama declared his intention to spread the wealth around.  We can't let liberal Democrats frame the debate for 3 years, and try to eke out a win, on their turf, in the last 2 months.    Wars aren't fought this way, and when they are, its disastrous.  We need to have some Gulf War 1 strategy here...the next 3 years offer an opportunity to frame the debate, on our terms, before the ground war of the election begins.   Show voters that redistribution of wealth is bad now, so that in 4 years Democrats will be laughed out of the room for advocating a 'soak the rich' policy.  Show voters that the free market does health care better than the government, so we don't have ot have a bidding war with Democrats in 4 years over health care policy and medicare expansion.  Frame the debate, and make them campaign on our turf.  For years we have been fighting on their turf, and either losing, or narrowly winning, and only after making liberal-lite promises we either can't or shouldn't keep.
 
5. Finally:  Chin Up
We live in a great country...we still have the most valient and skilled military in the world.  We are still a nation of entreprenours like Joe The Plumber.  The American people are talented, strong, and resilient.
 
Things change...the Democrats were given up for dead after 2004...what a difference 4 years make.  Its fun, and easy, on election night to prognosticate 30 years of politics based on one nights results.  But its not valuable.   Events change, scandals happen, crises happen, succesess happen.  Tonight is about tonight...the future isn't known...don't pretend it is.
 
God is still God.  The sky is still blue.   Life goes on.  Don't let a political defeat ruin you're life.  Politics is deadly serious business, but its not everything.   We conservatives advocate limited government.  Now is the time to live it.   The Government is not the country...the people are the country...in addition to keeping up the fight for our principles, go enjoy being one of the people.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Overconfidence

Obama,Overconfident,Overconfidence
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Out For the Year?

 
First Tom Brady. Now, Barack Obama.. 

Tests on Tuesday revealed that the Illinois Senator tore his Anterior Kosiate Ligament, or AKL, and may be out for the season.   Obama’s campaign had been limping since the announcement of Sarah Palin as John McCain’s vice presidential choice, but today’s “lipstick on a pig” attack revealed the true extent of the injury. 

The AKL is responsible for holding the tongues of liberal politicians. It prevents candidates from veering into Daily Kos-esque personal attacks, and destructive, elitist comments. Obama’s running mate, Joe Biden, lost his AKL during a childhood bout with the chicken pox, and is prone to verbal gaffes and personal attacks, like the one Obama made today. 

One Obama official, who refused to be named, suggested he may have to be taken off the campaign trail. “I knew something was seriously wrong when Keith Olbermann let out a girlish shriek after the Palin acceptance speech…I’m not surpised at all.”   Another staffer suggested it was in Obama’s best interest to take him off the ticket. “Barack has to look past this election…he has a promising career as a serial autobiographer that he’s putting in jeopardy if he stays on the stump with the injury.”
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Inside Team Obama

The way a candidate runs a campaign says a lot about how they will run the country.  For all the talk about our flawed election process, the way candidate handles it does give us a good window into how they react to events,  and who they surround themselves with.
 
In the last couple weeks, We have learned some things from Obama.  In his massive overreaction to the Corsi book, his decision to attack John McCain over houses (opening the door to Rezko attacks), and now an ad raising the issue of William Ayers, before McCain did, a theme is emerging.  This is a team that either doesn't feel free to offer contrary opinions, or doesn't have any.   Neither bodes well for a candidate's leadership style.
 
Obama's press releases sound similar to excellent work that you'll find here.  No I'm not saying that he is a communist, but his campaign does reflect some of the endemic problems of a political system that prohibits dissent and free thought.
 
I recall from my college days learning about an international faux pas where the Chinese government, in the early nineties, presented bricks from Tianemen Square as a gift to foreign dignataries.  Its the sort of thing that would never happen in an organization that allowed dissent, and represented differing views.  In a similar situation, in the United States, a staffer would have said, "You know, the rest of the world doesn't see that whole Tianemen Square thing the way we do, they are still upset over that tank issue..."
 
And that's really the vibe we are getting from the Obama campaign.  Collect a bunch of ideologue academics, ostracize the dissenters, like the Clinton team, and foster of culture of blind obedience.  Someone in Obama's campaign was afraid to say, or didn't think it needed to be said, that "We shouldn't bring up our candidates terrorist friends in a TV ad we are paying for."   Or, "That Corsi book is selling well, but not getting undecided voters attention, we should ignore it."  Or "You know, let McCain stew in his own juice on the house thing...we don't want talk about houses, especially with our guys Rezko issue."
 
Instead, you have an ideologically homogenous, reflexive campaign, that lashes out with full ferocity at anyone who dares question "The One".  
 
That's not a good way to run a campaign, or a country.  Will Obama surround himself with only hard left foreign policy advisors (a mostly rhetorical question), or bring in a "Team B" to give a differing view point on an uncertain issue, like say, what to do about Russia.  Will he listen to advisors who tell him that he is wrong?  Or will we see press releases from the White House that look like this?
 
General Secretary Kim Jong Il is a peerlessly great man who provided a sure political and military guarantee for the prosperity of the DPRK under the banner of Songun, says Rodong Sinmun Tuesday in a signed article. 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Pushback...Part 2

More from Barack Obama's ill advised "rebuttal" to the Jerome Corsi book...

LIE: “This reference establishes that Obama Senior was considered at the time to be ‘a radical economist’ and leaves no doubt that Obama Senior had gravitated from his longtime family supporter Tom Mboya to the more extreme communist position openly advocated by and identified with Odinga Odinga.” [pp 110-111]

REALITY: NO ONE WITH “A SHRED OF INTEGRITY” OR INTELLIGENCE WOULD CALL OBAMA SR A COMMUNIST BASED ON HIS ACADEMIC WORK


Kenya Expert, Economist And UCLA Visiting Professor Dr. Omwami Said That Obama Sr.’s Projections And Critiques Are So Spot On That He Plans On Assigning The Paper In His Future Classes.

"But Kenya expert Dr. Raymond Omwami, an economist and UCLA visiting professor from the University of Helsinki who has also worked at the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, said Obama Sr. could not be considered a socialist himself based solely on the material in his bylined piece. Omwami points out Obama Sr.’s paper was primarily a harsh critique of the controversial 1965 government document known as the “Sessional Paper No. 10.” Sessional Paper No. 10 rejected classic Karl Marx philosophies then embraced by the Soviet Union and some European countries, calling instead for a new type of socialism to be used specifically in Africa… Obama Sr.’s projections and critiques are so spot on, says Omwami, that he plans on assigning the
paper to his classes in the future.” [Politico, 4/15/08]
 
To paraphrase.  "My dad wasn't a communist.  He was a an innovative socialist.  See, even this visiting UCLA professor and economist, a right wing credential if ever there was one, thinks he was a moderate."
 
In one fell swoop, Obama's team declares that Obama's dad was a far left guy (not such a big deal, but not something you want voters thinking about), and more damaging, reveals that Obama and his staff, as many conservatives have observed, are so far left and out of touch that they find a UCLA economist an objective expert, and that socialism (like communism, but without the mass-killing) is not a problem.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Pushback...

Barack Obama's crack staff just put out a response to the New York Times best seller "Obama Nation" by Jerome Corsi.  From the looks of it, it would have been a good day for Obama's staff to go on vacation with their boss, rather than publish this response.
 
First, as others have pointed out, this looks a lot like using a hatchet as a flyswatter.  I haven't read Corsi's book, but I think its fair to say the book, while selling very well, wasn't going to be influential to undecided or Obama-leaners.  The press that protected John Edwards from unfriendly facts wasn't going to put Corsi's allegations on a front page anytime soon.
 
Second, Obama's response reads like a North Korean or Cuban state-run publication, lots of over-the-top adjectives, non-sequiters, but not a lot of substance.  Its the kind of thing that you only see from organizations where ideologies aren't exactly diverse, and editors don't feel free to say things like "you might want to tone that phrase down a bit...", or "...that doesn't make our case very well..."
 
Third, Obama's response doesn't answer the claims that it purports to, and in many cases, brings Obama's major weaknesses back to the forefront.
 
An example...

LIE:

“As a vice president, Madelyn Dunham would have earned enough to be well off, even if not rich.” [p 71]

REALITY: DUNHAMS LIVED MODESTLY

Obama’s Grandparents Rented A Two Bedroom Apartment In Honolulu.

The Chicago Tribune reported,

“At age 11, Obama was sent to Hawaii to live with his grandparents. They lived in a modest two-bedroom Honolulu apartment in order to save money for Obama’s tuition to attend the Punahou Academy, an elite private school.” [Emphasis mine] [Chicago Tribune, 10/22/2004]

Let's get this straight...A two-bedroom apartment in Honolulu isn't exactly an Airstream trailer.  A quick search on CNN's money page reveals that Honolulu housing today costs about 63% more than my hometown of Greeley, Colorado, part of the flyover country that Obama thinks he can appeal to.   Obama's defense on the very gentle charge of being "well-off" points out that he lived in a expensive area, and went to an elite private school.  Well done.
 
More to follow...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Georgia...

The rapidly deteriorating situation in Georgia leaves  a sick feeling in the stomach.  When the American left has been crying wolf about an imperialist, aggressive war for oil in Iraq, a real oil and power grab is taking place at the edge of Europe, and the left has very little left to say.
 
Georgia has been a loyal ally of the United States.  They provided troops for Iraq, even as our own politicians sought a withdrawal.  They want to be a western democracy, and are eager to break the yoke of the Bear.   And now, if we believe media reports, their military is on the run, the Russians have destroyed their largest port, and key cities have fallen.  And the world can't do much more than watch.  The most we can currently threaten Russia with is the loss of an Olympic games, and some sanctions.  Sanctions that won't take effect in time to save Georgia.
 
And Russia has every reason to believe they can get away with it.  Just a few weeks before the invasion,Germany vetoed Georgia's bid for a membership path into NATO.  With that, Russia had the green light.
 
I was 9 when the Berlin wall fell.  Most in my generation don't have clear memories of Eastern Europe behind the iron curtain.  We haven't seen client states, beholden to their massive neighbor.   For a generation of Americans, we think that this kind of thing can't really happen.  And Putin is smart enough to fool American Liberals, and Obama-kids.  As long as he doesn't raise the Russian flag over Tblisi, he can install a puppet regime, exile the pro-western leaders, and subjugate a neighbor, and many in the West will accept Russian propaganda, that each incursion of the Russian Army is, as it was in Poland in the 1980's, at the request of the "independent" neighbor.   Georgia will be subjucated, and Russia's neigbors will be on notice, that Russia will have her oil, and have her territory.
 
Whatever can be done, needs to be done.  Russia needs to stare in the face of not just sanctions, but near catastrophic sanctions.  Georgia (if she still exists), Ukraine, and other pro-western Russian neighbors need to get emergency NATO member status, and a healthy complement of American money and materiel, so the next time Putin tries to strike out, he does so in the face of not just international condemnation, but F-16's, Patriot Missiles, and Abrams tanks.   The Cold War was too long, too painful, and too costly to begin again.  Putin needs to be stopped before the Hammer and Sickle are flying again.
Tags: georgia   putin  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »